000			01544cam a22001817a 4500
999			_c68359 _d68359
020			_a978-93-80864-98-3
082			_b22069 _a491.25 M3171 D
100			_aManoj V R
245		0	_aDhātūnāmanekārthatvasādhanam = _hSanskrit and English _bDhātūnāmanékārthatvasāḍhanam : validating the multiple sense of roots supported by textual excerpts classic examples and English summary _cManoj V R
250			_a1st ed.
260			_aErnakulam _bChinmaya Internationala Foundation Shodha Sansthan _c2014
300			_a96
490			_aChinmaya Research Series 9
500			_aScholars of all branches of learning in Sanskrit oft-quote and endorse the theory of the multiple sense-ess of Sanskrit verbal roots to vouch for the specific meaning a verbal form conveys in a given context. It is natural for any language to have numerous nouns and adjectives because naming of entities and describing their qualities are not founded on grammatical propositions. Different entities may have same names and they may share similar characteristics. But verbs that describe actions should have unambiguous sense for the reason that actions have definable parameters. All other components of a sentence have definite and invariable connection to the verb and the specific action it describes. This work proposes to examine different views on this subject and would settle on the multiple senses of the roots and prop up the indicative-ness of the prefixes.l
650			_aSanskrit language Grammar
650			_aSanskrit language--Roots
942			_cBK